"UA" (Unauthorized Authentic)Who is the one who thinks wearing Putian shoes is embarrassing?

"UA" (Unauthorized Authentic)Who is the one who thinks wearing Putian shoes is embarrassing?， 

Embarrassed by the Visibility of Putian Shoes

In the realm of fashion and consumer culture, the perception of certain brands and their associated products often becomes a marker of identity, status, and social acceptance. Putian shoes, originating from the Putian region in China's Fujian province, have become a subject of controversy among some circles. There are those who view wearing Putian shoes as an act of pride, as a testament to their appreciation for quality and comfort, while others find it somewhat embarrassing.

The latter group of people, who find wearing Putian shoes a source of embarrassment, often belong to the more affluent sections of society with a strong emphasis on exclusive branding and status symbols. In their eyes, certain brands of footwear are seen as indicators of success and belonging to a certain social class. They might not directly criticize those wearing Putian shoes, but their reactions such as avoidance or subtle judgments are enough to make the wearer feel excluded and ashamed.

Who are these People?

These individuals are often part of a larger social network where brand loyalty and consumer culture play a significant role in defining one’s identity. They might be professionals in the corporate world, students at elite schools, or members of certain social clubs. Their sense of belonging and identity is often tied to the labels on their clothes and accessories.

It is not that they necessarily have anything against Putian shoes as a product category. Rather, it is the association of wearing them in certain social contexts that brings about the shame. This shame might stem from fear of being perceived as ‘unfashionable’ or ‘ordinary’, given that Putian shoes are often associated with the general populace rather than the privileged few.

In this regard, the shame is not necessarily about the shoes themselves but about how they are interpreted within a specific social setting. It is about being judged by others based on external factors rather than one’s actual qualities or achievements.

In conclusion, while the act of wearing Putian shoes might be seen as an everyday choice for comfort and quality by many, some individuals find it uncomfortable due to the potential social judgments that might arise from it. The shame lies not in the shoes but in the perception of others and the resulting social implications.